🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."